← Back to context

Comment by pixelready

6 hours ago

This works the same way irl too. The US is one of the most heavily propagandized populations in history. You have to be talking to a very progressive, very politically savvy group to not constantly run into the usual knee jerk canned responses the second you bring up any criticism of military spending, foreign policy, or the panopticon. Probing of those responses in family or social settings for actual justification shows there’s no first principle reasoning behind them, just a vague unease about discussing the topics, like they’re sacrilege.

Yes, the frothy-mouthed ideation of the US cultural identity is just as frustrating to have to contend with as any other ideology. I've met great Iranian folks and great American folks, and great Russians too - and what they all have in common is the ability to reflect on the limits of their own cultures.

>The US is one of the most heavily propagandized populations in history.

I see this statement repeated often with no supporting evidence. Seems a little ironic!

Is this claim falsifiable?

Would you be able to name the 2nd or 3rd most propagandized populations, in your view? Do you know anything about propaganda in e.g. the USSR or North Korea?

"Historian Sergo Mikoyan claimed that decades prior to the early 1960s, offices and stores had to submit papers with examples of their typewriters' typeface to local KGB branches so that any printed text could be traced back to the source, to prosecute those who had used the typewriter to produce material deemed illegal. With the introduction of photocopying machines, the KGB's Fifth Directorate and Agitprop Department required individuals to get authorization to use printing office photocopiers to prevent the mass production of unapproved material, though restrictions could be bypassed by bribing employees."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samizdat

That's what an actual heavily-propagandized population looks like. Meanwhile, I can open up any social media app and be greeted by a sea of anti-American slop.

  • Just because you get “anti-American slop” doesn’t mean your “pro-American slop” is accurate, nor productive in the context of world affairs.

    Americans are among the most propagandized because they are taught theirs is the greatest among all nations from birth, even though it really, really isn’t.

    • >Americans are among the most propagandized because they are taught theirs is the greatest among all nations from birth, even though it really, really isn’t.

      That's not what it means to be the "most propagandized".

      In any case, as an American, I wasn't taught that the US is the "greatest among all nations" from birth.

      But I think there are some quite good arguments for this claim nonetheless. Here's a nice detailed article from a historian which lays out the evidence: https://acoup.blog/2022/07/08/collections-is-the-united-stat...

      The world has gotten much better while under US hegemony by the way. This has generally been a peaceful and prosperous era by historical standards. https://thumb.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/The...

      Usually the anti-US argument depends on implicitly assuming that:

      * All the good things which have happened, would've happened without the US.

      * All the bad things which have happened are the direct fault of the US. Other actors are deemed irrelevant/not morally culpable/etc.

      * Bad things that the US successfully prevented or interrupted would somehow have been prevented or interrupted via other means.

      * If the US could've done something, but did not, they are also morally culpable for that omission.

      It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" type of game. If there's any delta between the US and a hypothetical perfect nation, that makes us evil.

      A nice quick illustration of how things work: Listen to Europeans complain about the US "playing world police", and also insist that the US should do more to police Eastern Europe. They'll claim the US started the Ukraine War by expanding NATO, and also insist that Ukraine should be armed to the teeth. Naturally, e.g. Poland's push to join NATO is left out: only the US is morally culpable (see second bullet point above).