← Back to context Comment by whatevaa 3 hours ago 9 woman can't bring baby in a month. That 3 hour estimate makes no sense. 3 comments whatevaa Reply synecdoche 3 hours ago It may do so in the form of volume or weight in carpentry materiel or other wood products. paulhebert 3 hours ago Yes but the people concerned about this are clearly concerned about the environmental impact of losing forested land, not how many wood products are available. watwut 3 hours ago But ... but ... but 2240 women can bring a baby in 3 hours! Surely!
synecdoche 3 hours ago It may do so in the form of volume or weight in carpentry materiel or other wood products. paulhebert 3 hours ago Yes but the people concerned about this are clearly concerned about the environmental impact of losing forested land, not how many wood products are available.
paulhebert 3 hours ago Yes but the people concerned about this are clearly concerned about the environmental impact of losing forested land, not how many wood products are available.
It may do so in the form of volume or weight in carpentry materiel or other wood products.
Yes but the people concerned about this are clearly concerned about the environmental impact of losing forested land, not how many wood products are available.
But ... but ... but 2240 women can bring a baby in 3 hours! Surely!