← Back to context Comment by kinduff 18 hours ago How is someone "aggressively pro AI"? This is the first time I read such concept. 9 comments kinduff Reply unified101 18 hours ago Is typically called ai booster. The opposite is ai doomer. SrslyJosh 17 hours ago Importantly, both boosters and doomers are believers (or perhaps cultists).A doomer isn't skeptical; they're nearly as credulous as boosters, or maybe more so in some ways. bigfishrunning 17 hours ago Not necessarily -- I am extremely anti-AI; I think the danger is not that it's good, it's that it's convincing. Turns out most people don't care about the quality of art or prose or code that they interact with, and it's very depressing. 4 replies → drusepth 18 hours ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_accelerationism paulddraper 18 hours ago Leans into AI adoption.
unified101 18 hours ago Is typically called ai booster. The opposite is ai doomer. SrslyJosh 17 hours ago Importantly, both boosters and doomers are believers (or perhaps cultists).A doomer isn't skeptical; they're nearly as credulous as boosters, or maybe more so in some ways. bigfishrunning 17 hours ago Not necessarily -- I am extremely anti-AI; I think the danger is not that it's good, it's that it's convincing. Turns out most people don't care about the quality of art or prose or code that they interact with, and it's very depressing. 4 replies →
SrslyJosh 17 hours ago Importantly, both boosters and doomers are believers (or perhaps cultists).A doomer isn't skeptical; they're nearly as credulous as boosters, or maybe more so in some ways. bigfishrunning 17 hours ago Not necessarily -- I am extremely anti-AI; I think the danger is not that it's good, it's that it's convincing. Turns out most people don't care about the quality of art or prose or code that they interact with, and it's very depressing. 4 replies →
bigfishrunning 17 hours ago Not necessarily -- I am extremely anti-AI; I think the danger is not that it's good, it's that it's convincing. Turns out most people don't care about the quality of art or prose or code that they interact with, and it's very depressing. 4 replies →
Is typically called ai booster. The opposite is ai doomer.
Importantly, both boosters and doomers are believers (or perhaps cultists).
A doomer isn't skeptical; they're nearly as credulous as boosters, or maybe more so in some ways.
Not necessarily -- I am extremely anti-AI; I think the danger is not that it's good, it's that it's convincing. Turns out most people don't care about the quality of art or prose or code that they interact with, and it's very depressing.
4 replies →
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_accelerationism
Leans into AI adoption.