← Back to context Comment by VCFundedGenYer 15 hours ago That was due to antitrust pressure such that they did not self-prefer their own apps. 3 comments VCFundedGenYer Reply cowlevel 11 hours ago You'd think that would force them to make the third party app experience as good as the first party app experience. Instead, they did the opposite... aesthesia 11 hours ago Seems like this is a signal that they in fact take the privacy concerns seriously? tpxl 3 hours ago If they took the privacy concerns seriously it wouldn't take anti-trust pressure for this to happen.
cowlevel 11 hours ago You'd think that would force them to make the third party app experience as good as the first party app experience. Instead, they did the opposite... aesthesia 11 hours ago Seems like this is a signal that they in fact take the privacy concerns seriously? tpxl 3 hours ago If they took the privacy concerns seriously it wouldn't take anti-trust pressure for this to happen.
aesthesia 11 hours ago Seems like this is a signal that they in fact take the privacy concerns seriously? tpxl 3 hours ago If they took the privacy concerns seriously it wouldn't take anti-trust pressure for this to happen.
tpxl 3 hours ago If they took the privacy concerns seriously it wouldn't take anti-trust pressure for this to happen.
You'd think that would force them to make the third party app experience as good as the first party app experience. Instead, they did the opposite...
Seems like this is a signal that they in fact take the privacy concerns seriously?
If they took the privacy concerns seriously it wouldn't take anti-trust pressure for this to happen.