ElementaryUI – Swift, in the Browser 12 hours ago (elementary.codes) 24 comments frizlab Reply Add to library adrusi 10 hours ago Reminiscent of the now 18-year-old Cappuccino project https://www.cappuccino.dev/ frizlab 9 hours ago Project that is still alive, amazingly. jdminhbg 4 hours ago The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive? 1 reply → thejazzman 4 hours ago > Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018) indstinctdialog 7 hours ago Objective-J is something I entirely forgot existed. sampton 9 hours ago I paid $20 for their interface builder and never got it. sapphire4 8 hours ago The web version of Keynote with it was amazing. pipeline_peak 10 hours ago I’d say this is closer to Blazor gosen 1 hour ago It would be interesting to see any benchmarks / comparisons to understand what are the benefits of having Swift in the browser. Is it faster? Easier to maintain? Or is it based more on the sympathy to the programming language in general?But great job anyway! pjmlp 18 minutes ago Bit by bit, we are having our beloved browser plugins back, at least for some of us. brailsafe 7 hours ago Looks a bit like jQuery mixed with jsx and ember or angular beans6543 11 hours ago Their demo is flakey and sometimes fails to hydrate in Firefox latest jan_m_savage 7 hours ago sooner or later this was gonna happen. Swift is like Haskell, but nicer and more programmer-friendly. isodev 1 hour ago I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s maxdo 9 hours ago Any reason/motivation why ? kamisori-daijin 10 hours ago Nice! MichaelTestGrid 26 minutes ago [flagged] pipeline_peak 10 hours ago We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose. frizlab 9 hours ago ‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app. alsetmusic 8 hours ago Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust. 1 reply → vips7L 2 hours ago Typescript isn’t that good of a language. astafrig 7 hours ago This sentiment is sorely missing from the endless Rust re-writes.
adrusi 10 hours ago Reminiscent of the now 18-year-old Cappuccino project https://www.cappuccino.dev/ frizlab 9 hours ago Project that is still alive, amazingly. jdminhbg 4 hours ago The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive? 1 reply → thejazzman 4 hours ago > Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018) indstinctdialog 7 hours ago Objective-J is something I entirely forgot existed. sampton 9 hours ago I paid $20 for their interface builder and never got it. sapphire4 8 hours ago The web version of Keynote with it was amazing. pipeline_peak 10 hours ago I’d say this is closer to Blazor
frizlab 9 hours ago Project that is still alive, amazingly. jdminhbg 4 hours ago The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive? 1 reply → thejazzman 4 hours ago > Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018)
gosen 1 hour ago It would be interesting to see any benchmarks / comparisons to understand what are the benefits of having Swift in the browser. Is it faster? Easier to maintain? Or is it based more on the sympathy to the programming language in general?But great job anyway!
pjmlp 18 minutes ago Bit by bit, we are having our beloved browser plugins back, at least for some of us.
jan_m_savage 7 hours ago sooner or later this was gonna happen. Swift is like Haskell, but nicer and more programmer-friendly. isodev 1 hour ago I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s
isodev 1 hour ago I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s
pipeline_peak 10 hours ago We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose. frizlab 9 hours ago ‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app. alsetmusic 8 hours ago Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust. 1 reply → vips7L 2 hours ago Typescript isn’t that good of a language. astafrig 7 hours ago This sentiment is sorely missing from the endless Rust re-writes.
frizlab 9 hours ago ‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app. alsetmusic 8 hours ago Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust. 1 reply →
Reminiscent of the now 18-year-old Cappuccino project https://www.cappuccino.dev/
Project that is still alive, amazingly.
The last release and blog post are from 2018, is it actually alive?
1 reply →
> Latest Version: 1.0.0 (September 4 2018)
Objective-J is something I entirely forgot existed.
I paid $20 for their interface builder and never got it.
The web version of Keynote with it was amazing.
I’d say this is closer to Blazor
It would be interesting to see any benchmarks / comparisons to understand what are the benefits of having Swift in the browser. Is it faster? Easier to maintain? Or is it based more on the sympathy to the programming language in general?
But great job anyway!
Bit by bit, we are having our beloved browser plugins back, at least for some of us.
Looks a bit like jQuery mixed with jsx and ember or angular
Their demo is flakey and sometimes fails to hydrate in Firefox latest
sooner or later this was gonna happen. Swift is like Haskell, but nicer and more programmer-friendly.
I wouldn’t fly so close to Apple if I have the choice. Apple could pivot at any moment - “New versions of Swift start at $99,99” /s
Any reason/motivation why ?
Nice!
[flagged]
We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose.
‘cause Swift is great, I guess! And more seriously, probably for a shared logic with an iOS & android app.
Just wait until they rewrite Swift with Rust.
1 reply →
Typescript isn’t that good of a language.
This sentiment is sorely missing from the endless Rust re-writes.