← Back to context Comment by baobabKoodaa 8 hours ago Yes it was done by 51% attack. The chain split into ETH and ETC. 4 comments baobabKoodaa Reply wmf 8 hours ago Not every chain split is a 51% attack. baobabKoodaa 7 hours ago Sure, some chain splits fail to get any significant support, so they don't reach anywhere near 51% of mining power. This one did. Hence, it's called a "51% attack". wmf 6 hours ago Nope. None of what you're saying is correct. 1 reply →
wmf 8 hours ago Not every chain split is a 51% attack. baobabKoodaa 7 hours ago Sure, some chain splits fail to get any significant support, so they don't reach anywhere near 51% of mining power. This one did. Hence, it's called a "51% attack". wmf 6 hours ago Nope. None of what you're saying is correct. 1 reply →
baobabKoodaa 7 hours ago Sure, some chain splits fail to get any significant support, so they don't reach anywhere near 51% of mining power. This one did. Hence, it's called a "51% attack". wmf 6 hours ago Nope. None of what you're saying is correct. 1 reply →
Not every chain split is a 51% attack.
Sure, some chain splits fail to get any significant support, so they don't reach anywhere near 51% of mining power. This one did. Hence, it's called a "51% attack".
Nope. None of what you're saying is correct.
1 reply →