Comment by mikae1
8 hours ago
All of them failed my ten second evaluation. It's amazing how many mediocre CSS frameworks that are out there.
8 hours ago
All of them failed my ten second evaluation. It's amazing how many mediocre CSS frameworks that are out there.
CSS frameworks are like children, almost everyone can make one.
What do you think of https://starter.bryanhogan.com/ then?
Useless - https://ibb.co/h1sRtYKF
What the hell browser is that?
1 reply →
Despite its idiotic naming, I still use PureCSS[0]. Not sure why they keep maintaining it. I don't mind, nothing ever seems to change anyway.
How's your ten second evaluation of it?
[0]: https://pure-css.github.io/
I'm using it but it's such a pain in the arse to find anything else online about it.
It's one of the reasons I'm planning on moving stuff over to Pico.
Or now, I guess, just writing some CSS from scratch, which I hate.
Yes it is a pain. But the whole thing is like two pages, so I^H my LLM just reads it. I used to read it. It was ok readable (and I'm not very good at CSS).
Whats the first thing in a CSS framework that you notice and makes you say "nah"?
What's your ten second evaluation?