Comment by littlecranky67
5 hours ago
Stablecoins are centralized and of course rely on trust - you need someone to exchange whatever asset they promise to guard for your tokens. I find them fascinating (in conjunction with the lighnint/taproot assets over bitcoin) and not necessarily unsafe.
In the freebanking era that the US had (before the FED was founded) every bank emmitet their own dollar. And, of course, there were banks over-issuing and bank runs left people without their assets. But that was before we had free flow of information and the internet. In todays world you can monitor and trade stablecoins, market cap, exchange rates in a freebanking system in sub-seconds. Any erosion in trust will immediately result in price fluctuations. We need a digital freebanking era, and it is a shame the genius act fell through. Exporting the dollar to people without access to banking would benefit the US (but I get that it currently mostly benefits trumps family).
I would not consider USDT to be an example for transparency or free flow of information. The selling point of USDT is that it's pegged to the US doller. Users put at lot of trust in both that 1:1 ratio and therefore indirectly in the US FED.
But: Are you sure that Tether is actually backed by USD? It certainly isn't free information.
USDT comes in many forms (technical side). You literally can trade USDT as one of the only major stablecoins over bitcoin+lightning network but that is not the entirety of all USDT in circulation. If you look into how this works (because it is fully decentralized running over bitcoin, not some proprietary blockchain) you will find out you can exactly get the market cap, which bitcoin wallet hold how many coins etc. Now lightning distorts that a bit, but market cap is not affected by that.
But it is in the nature of stablecoins that you cannot check their vault. You have no idea if they actually store the assets they claim to store. And whether they will honor their promise to exchange that asset for their tokens.