Comment by danishanish
13 hours ago
If most of their revenue was fraudulent it doesn’t prove anything. I’m not saying it’s proof against, but it’s definitely not proof for, either.
13 hours ago
If most of their revenue was fraudulent it doesn’t prove anything. I’m not saying it’s proof against, but it’s definitely not proof for, either.
I was misremembering, they were sued for spam laws, not for their revenue being fraudulent so it seems it's legitimate, making a billion in revenue with one person (and later on his brother who was hired), the rest is all AI.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/technology/ai-billion-dol...
https://www.businessinsider.com/medvi-ai-weight-loss-million...