← Back to context

Comment by p1esk

15 hours ago

Why did he believe what he claimed? Did he have any arguments to back it up?

This article goes over his methods and why they're ridiculous:

"The fourth fatal error Nordhaus makes is the most farcical. In a 1991 paper that became a touchstone for all his later work, he assumed that, because 87 percent of GDP occurs in what he called “carefully controlled environments” — otherwise known as “indoors” — it will not be affected by climate.

...

Ignorance of systems has its way of plowing forward, juggernaut-like. Nordhaus has opined that agriculture is “the part of the economy that is sensitive to climate change,” but because it accounts for just 3 per cent of national output, climate disruption of food production cannot produce a “very large effect on the U.S. economy.” "

https://theecologist.org/2023/nov/01/when-idiot-savants-do-c...