Comment by oneeyedpigeon
2 days ago
I thought it was a great write up. It did feel a bit AI-coded, but whether it actually was or not, it's still a good bit of work imo.
2 days ago
I thought it was a great write up. It did feel a bit AI-coded, but whether it actually was or not, it's still a good bit of work imo.
I dunno, there were some strange discrepancies in the explanation (and captions). Didn't really hang together.
Looks good overall, but I was wondering if eg. "the timer learns nothing" and "no X, no Y, no Z" was slop rather than a deliberate choice.
Slop, no question. There's at least 10 Claudisms on the page, and I'm not that good at smelling them. Some of the sentences might have been human-written.
fwiw pangram believes the text is AI as well
It would be weird to spend this much effort doing the site by hand, for a bug that the author says was found by a swarm of agents.