Comment by hedora
1 day ago
You can always write:
x : Result<string, err> = function...
dangerous_function();
switch(x) {
Ok() ...
Error() ...
}
There's no difference between result and null other than readability (there's a mechanical transformation between the two, where you use unwrap() in rust on an unchecked null dereference, and you read errno in C instead of looking inside the Err() result variant).
To be clear, I strongly prefer Result<> because of the readability, but any dumb thing you can write with NULL + errno can be written with Result (and vice versa).
Totally! I threw that first example in because it's the poster child for things (checked) exceptions solve, and I didn't want to unfairly favor result unions (which I also prefer).