← Back to context Comment by mwkaufma 1 day ago Feels like intentional brand-confusion with Blender. 2 comments mwkaufma Reply MobiusHorizons 20 hours ago It is a derivative work, isn’t that appropriate? Or are you saying it shouldn’t have blender in the name unless it’s owned or officially sanctioned by the company that owns the blender trademark? mwkaufma 14 hours ago It's just obviously trying to ride coattails with vibe-shit. If "blender" wasn't in the name it wouldn't be on the HN frontpage.
MobiusHorizons 20 hours ago It is a derivative work, isn’t that appropriate? Or are you saying it shouldn’t have blender in the name unless it’s owned or officially sanctioned by the company that owns the blender trademark? mwkaufma 14 hours ago It's just obviously trying to ride coattails with vibe-shit. If "blender" wasn't in the name it wouldn't be on the HN frontpage.
mwkaufma 14 hours ago It's just obviously trying to ride coattails with vibe-shit. If "blender" wasn't in the name it wouldn't be on the HN frontpage.
It is a derivative work, isn’t that appropriate? Or are you saying it shouldn’t have blender in the name unless it’s owned or officially sanctioned by the company that owns the blender trademark?
It's just obviously trying to ride coattails with vibe-shit. If "blender" wasn't in the name it wouldn't be on the HN frontpage.