Comment by amelius
4 hours ago
Because the article itself is way more interesting than the question of with what style it was written.
4 hours ago
Because the article itself is way more interesting than the question of with what style it was written.
It's like the saying beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clean to the bone. Bad AI writing makes an article "unreadable" - you'd have to force yourself to read it, and people don't get paid for reading stuff on HN. The HN value of an unpleasant to read article is basically zero.
I really don't want to waste more words on it here.
I think the difference might be that you find bad style easy to ignore and I don't.
3 replies →
You don't have to leave a comment if you are too lazy to read it. It's not even if the words were written mirrored. Anyone who can read English including children can read the output of AI without needing to force anything. Maybe you need to see a doctor if you need to force yourself to read it.
"How dare you have a preference that is not my preference?"
Its interestingness is zero if it’s so aggravating to read that you just give up.