Comment by otterley
3 hours ago
> The inefficient mode of transmutation was chosen because I find slop's value proposition dubious.
You’re proving my last paragraph. (Also, if you don’t know how to make AI generate good things instead of slop, now is a very crucial time to learn.)
No, my second reply to you was to illustrate the absurdity of the second paragraph of your post to which it replied. If you perceive a flaw in it then it is likely a case of the fox smelling its own hole.
Neither is there any need to sleuth your way to what I "actually" believe. I have already given you the answer.
Your attempts at misdirection are unavailing.
In the original message I was responding to, you were not alluding to a level playing field. You were alluding to no field at all.
If that is not what you intended, I welcome a clarification.