← Back to context Comment by milfot 12 years ago maybe, maybe not point is, it is a very effective idea for civil disobedience 2 comments milfot Reply sdoowpilihp 12 years ago It's effectiveness is not proven one way or another, as it has not been implemented by many people, or tested in a court of law. At best, it's a novel hack. milfot 12 years ago sure, wasn't saying it was.. and you just committed the same indiscretion. a hack is only a hack if it does something.let's say it is a potentially very effective idea for CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE..emphasis due to you kind of missing the point - arguing about the legality of such a thing is pure misdirection imho
sdoowpilihp 12 years ago It's effectiveness is not proven one way or another, as it has not been implemented by many people, or tested in a court of law. At best, it's a novel hack. milfot 12 years ago sure, wasn't saying it was.. and you just committed the same indiscretion. a hack is only a hack if it does something.let's say it is a potentially very effective idea for CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE..emphasis due to you kind of missing the point - arguing about the legality of such a thing is pure misdirection imho
milfot 12 years ago sure, wasn't saying it was.. and you just committed the same indiscretion. a hack is only a hack if it does something.let's say it is a potentially very effective idea for CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE..emphasis due to you kind of missing the point - arguing about the legality of such a thing is pure misdirection imho
It's effectiveness is not proven one way or another, as it has not been implemented by many people, or tested in a court of law. At best, it's a novel hack.
sure, wasn't saying it was.. and you just committed the same indiscretion. a hack is only a hack if it does something.
let's say it is a potentially very effective idea for CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE..
emphasis due to you kind of missing the point - arguing about the legality of such a thing is pure misdirection imho