Comment by baddox

> A big part of my point is that it doesn't matter what an author is thinking when it comes to discussing how others will react to it.

The problem with that idea is that humans have this pesky thing called "free will" or "agency." We are capable of choosing how we react to things we hear others say. That makes speaking incredibly difficult if your primary concern is whether any human in the world will react by taking offense.

> We can safely say that the creator was thinking of brogramming.

Even if that's the case, is it possible that the idea is to mock the concept of "brogramming"?