Comment by terabytest
11 years ago
The latest stats show no "game-win" events :P It might just be a matter of time though.
EDIT: oops, there was a bug in the win/lose tracking so I probably missed out on a few wins. I fixed it now, so it should hopefully track it if someone else wins!
I just beat it! First try.. but I've been addicted to Threes for the past week or so.
http://i.imgur.com/nf25AVZ.png
If that's real, congrats! I had started doubting that anybody would ever win the game :P
It took me a few tries, but it's definitely winnable.
Do you have new numbers? I got a bunch of people addicted and I assume I'm not the only one.
Can you add in how many moves!!?
6 replies →
Beat it! http://screencast.com/t/2b3zNbYy6HDi
http://www.screencast.com/t/NYuiFDueop8
:P I guess it was almost perfect attempt, and the quickest of mine so far (just a single 16 apart of 2048)
okay, and i win... and my record is 32768 score so what? it was fun) my screen: http://upload.freehacks.ru/MKPEP2 my implementation and guide you can found there: http://vk.cc/2nGPL3
Looks legit
I'm gonna call fake on this one.
There's actually a semi-optimal strategy that nearly guarantees winning if you're diligent about it. Just build a stairstep pattern with the highest numbers in the bottom corner of the stairs. Then basically combine sideways and downward and "always" resist the temptation to push up. Its kind of how some tri-diagonal matrix algorithms work. The only problem is you have to be fastidious about never using the one direction you've reserved as your excluded case (Up in my example) as that can screw your staircase by putting a [2] right underneath your wonderful [1024]. Just move blocks back and forth, waiting for the right blocks to create combo patterns, while generally storing lower cost blocks on the outside of the stairs, and then snake them through the stairs when you get a chain set up.
Ex:
x x x 2
x x 2 4
x 2 4 8
2 4 8 16
9 replies →
With enough tries anything is possible. There is probably even a person who ascended nethack on his first try (using the wiki of course, we're still talking things with p > 0) and didn't play it again because it's too easy and boring.
1 reply →
And here's another win, took me a fair few hours though.
http://imgur.com/9FckZVX
I'd be interested in seeing the lowest winning score, highest winning score, and lowest losing score (!)
Managed to purposefully lose with 627 points. Lowest I've managed to lose by. :)