← Back to context Comment by toolslive 11 years ago a bit lower: http://imgur.com/yPnUt8N 2 comments toolslive Reply joebobfrank 11 years ago Even lower: 20148http://imgur.com/28YNfDSThat's pretty damn near optimal, might have had an extra 2 when doing the final collapse, can't remember. crazykt 11 years ago Even lower : 20132 http://imgur.com/dWiXGaW
joebobfrank 11 years ago Even lower: 20148http://imgur.com/28YNfDSThat's pretty damn near optimal, might have had an extra 2 when doing the final collapse, can't remember. crazykt 11 years ago Even lower : 20132 http://imgur.com/dWiXGaW
Even lower: 20148
http://imgur.com/28YNfDS
That's pretty damn near optimal, might have had an extra 2 when doing the final collapse, can't remember.
Even lower : 20132 http://imgur.com/dWiXGaW