Comment by mcintyre1994
12 years ago
If purging (substantial and interesting) one-to-one conversation is an intended effect I think that'd be a shame.
12 years ago
If purging (substantial and interesting) one-to-one conversation is an intended effect I think that'd be a shame.
No, that's not intended. If it happens we'll fix it.
This would be great to keep an eye on.
eg:
Two commenters X,Y with sub-threshold karma (<1,000) could never have a dialogue (two-way, real-time) as a third party Z would need to endorse their each and every comment.
Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) in substantially different timezones with a-synchronous dialogue (eg, overnight replies) would need a third party z to endorse each and every comment (at least until the other wakes up).
Two commenters X,Y (Karma 1,000+ each) with opposing views, could never have a real-time dialogue without a third party z to endorse each and every comment (unless #)
Hopefully these are at least helpful to dilineate.
# "Thank you sir, can I have another".