← Back to context

Comment by pjc50

11 years ago

They had something similar in XNA, but unaccountably abandoned it.

XNA was quite far from what Unity is. Unity gives you a full engine, whereas XNA was a framework and you had to build the engine yourself. It was a great little library, but it was painful for unskilled software developers (myself at the time) to use it compared to Unity's WYSIWYG and property lists you could modify, not to mention all of the things that came with Unity that you'd have to build custom in XNA.

That's not to say Unity is better, it was just easier to use.