Comment by thisrod
12 years ago
Do you know of any controlled experiments to test the safety claims for automatic traction control? People used to say similar things about ABS. Then the experiments were done, it turned out to be pointless or possibly dangerous, and people started talking about traction control instead.
Automatic bounds checking could well fail the same way that ABS did: programmers won't bother defining a packet data type, because the compiler will catch any mistakes they make fiddling with arrays. So, like drivers with ABS, programmers with ABC would go faster, but they wouldn't be any safer.
Maybe a better analogy would be roll bars or seat belts: If they help prevent something from breaking, you've already screwed up.
Nothing can prevent bad drivers from driving poorly, and nothing can prevent apathetic programmers from writing insecure code. However, even though I tend to program in C, I can still appreciate environments that will catch dumb mistakes for me and prevent them from turning into security issues.
ABS pointless? The Wikipedia article disagrees, so I'd certainly like to know more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-lock_braking_system#Effect...
ESC is certainly shown to be effective, although I don't know about traction control: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_stability_control#Ef...