← Back to context Comment by tptacek 12 years ago Nobody said anything negative about Rust; in fact, it has nothing to do with this thread. 4 comments tptacek Reply bjz_ 12 years ago It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them. tptacek 12 years ago No, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate. gnuvince 12 years ago In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink. 1 reply →
bjz_ 12 years ago It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them. tptacek 12 years ago No, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate. gnuvince 12 years ago In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink. 1 reply →
tptacek 12 years ago No, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate. gnuvince 12 years ago In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink. 1 reply →
gnuvince 12 years ago In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink. 1 reply →
It was poorly expressed, but I think gnuvince was referring to the fact that it is possible to implement machine-friendly ADTs. Rust is just one example of a language that has them.
No, that's not what 'gnuvince was trying to communicate.
In fact, that's exactly what I meant, but thanks for trying to be my shrink.
1 reply →