← Back to context

Comment by 3pt14159

11 years ago

De-escalation is more effective than the slight tactical advantage.

But de-escalation training is expensive, whereas equipment is often given almost for free from ex-military surplus or paid for from "anti-terrorism" federal funds.

Police in other Western countries receive significantly longer training courses than US police do. This is an issue rarely discussed in this topic. If people want de-escalation, they need to fund the longer training regime and more importantly pay for it.

  • >ex-military surplus

    maybe reallocating funds from military to de-escalation training would reduce surplus and improve police image and effectiveness.

    (disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about)

Has it really come to vilifying a haircut? The haircut is not to blame for anything here, it is all the people who may happen to wear it.

Short hair is pragmatic, but more importantly, it is a personal preference. Nobody should be criticized for wearing short hair. Doing that makes you no better than people who talk about "long-haired hippies" disparagingly.