Comment by jmsdnns 10 years ago Why not bitbucket? 4 comments jmsdnns Reply briandear 10 years ago Bitbucket's UX and integrations are worse than Github. dvdgsng 10 years ago That's almost entirely subjective. YMMV. zabuni 10 years ago Bitbucket requires payment for larger numbers of collaborators. Github requires payment for private repositories. Open source requires unlimited collaborators, and no one wants to pay. ddbennett 10 years ago Public (Open Source) repositories on Bitbucket do not have a limit to the number of contributors.
briandear 10 years ago Bitbucket's UX and integrations are worse than Github. dvdgsng 10 years ago That's almost entirely subjective. YMMV.
zabuni 10 years ago Bitbucket requires payment for larger numbers of collaborators. Github requires payment for private repositories. Open source requires unlimited collaborators, and no one wants to pay. ddbennett 10 years ago Public (Open Source) repositories on Bitbucket do not have a limit to the number of contributors.
ddbennett 10 years ago Public (Open Source) repositories on Bitbucket do not have a limit to the number of contributors.
Bitbucket's UX and integrations are worse than Github.
That's almost entirely subjective. YMMV.
Bitbucket requires payment for larger numbers of collaborators. Github requires payment for private repositories. Open source requires unlimited collaborators, and no one wants to pay.
Public (Open Source) repositories on Bitbucket do not have a limit to the number of contributors.