Comment by tn13
10 years ago
There is noting lazy or bad about using bootstrap. In fact it has made HTML far more readable and maintainable. It has also made web in general more beautiful than it use to be.
10 years ago
There is noting lazy or bad about using bootstrap. In fact it has made HTML far more readable and maintainable. It has also made web in general more beautiful than it use to be.
I can understand the part on the "more beautiful" but I for the html part I suppose you don't have to deal everyday with things like :
I do. And I still prefer it over the alternative.
I fail to see the issue here?
Exactly! Those three lines of Bootstrap HTML tells me lot more than any other three lines of a non bootstrap site.
Same, this is a million times more legible than the HTML Google Material Design uses.
You can always replace the divs with more semantic markup, just with the Bootstrap classes attached. I mean, using a main element for the container, a div for the row, then an article and various aside elements for the columns (depending on the layout and structure) will at least make the source code somewhat easier to parse.