I actually disagree with this "improvement" in all but one of seven of his CSS declarations. The default font size, the pure black on pure white, line height, and default margins are all fine in default plain HTML pages. However, since computer screens have increased in width since the first web pages were designed, I've added this user style to all pages I visit.
p { max-width: 50em; }
I challenge everyone to go for an entire day with CSS disabled (View -> Page Style -> No Style on Firefox). It will help your design skills if you are a designer.
I think it looked just fine.
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
Also http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
I actually disagree with this "improvement" in all but one of seven of his CSS declarations. The default font size, the pure black on pure white, line height, and default margins are all fine in default plain HTML pages. However, since computer screens have increased in width since the first web pages were designed, I've added this user style to all pages I visit.
I challenge everyone to go for an entire day with CSS disabled (View -> Page Style -> No Style on Firefox). It will help your design skills if you are a designer.
That doesn't contain any buttons or grids or any of the interactive stuff that Bootstrap provides, so its not a great comparison.
If you think that looks just fine, what do you actually think looks bad?
Anything where the text and background colours are such that it's difficult to read, for one.