Comment by eugenekolo2

10 years ago

Nice looking, but it's just IDA w/ Undo, and less features.

There has to be a shift in use case design more than making it prettier.

6 comments

eugenekolo2

Reply
whorleater  10 years ago

IDA is typically too expensive for hobbyist reverse engineers, not to mention has a pretty steep learning curve for it. If this helps introduce new people into reverse engineering I'm all for it.

eugeneionesco  10 years ago

Give them a break man, it's the first release...

  • eugenekolo2  10 years ago

    Don't take it the wrong way. It looks like a nice start. I just wish for better reversing tooling, and am merely giving a critique that if this was to replace IDA for me, it'd have to provide something that IDA does not.

    • psifertex  10 years ago

      There's plenty of things IDA does that we don't do, but the list of things we do they don't is growing.

      To start with, we have undo, which is a simple feature but it underlies some design decisions that are going to show up in other features in the near future as well.

      Because we have the ability to separate user interactions from our internal analysis we can not only undo, but also better support collaborative editing and upgrading of older saved databases.

      In terms of features we already have, we have a static data flow implementation that allows you to query register values at addresses which greatly simplifies a lot of analysis plugins. Here's an example:

      http://arm.ninja/2016/03/08/intro-to-binary-ninja-api/

      (The domain name is a coincidence, Q was just a beta tester, not officially affiliated with us)

      Notice how much more robust and simpler the final implementation of that plugin using our data flow is:

      https://github.com/Vector35/binaryninja-api/blob/dev/python/...

      1 reply →