Comment by ndespres
10 years ago
One thing I'd like to see explained is the location of "Programs" at the top of the Start menu, rather than right at the bottom where it would be closer and less mouse movement. I do think the Start menu is a much better location for the program list than their earlier idea, a Programs folder on the "Desktop," and better still than the Windows 3.0 Program Manager. But I wonder what the thinking behind making the user mouse up past Run, Find, and Settings to get to Programs, when their research indicates that "opening a program" was the primary objective of a user. I know it's an old joke that "you have to click Start to Shut Down," but it does seem far from the way the Apple menu worked at the time for effectively the same thing.
http://www.sigchi.org/chi96/proceedings/desbrief/Sullivan/kd...
"Launching Programs: Start Menu. Although we abandoned the idea of a separate shell for beginners, we salvaged its most useful features: single-click access, high visibility, and menu-based interaction. We mocked up a number of representations in Visual Basic and tested them with users of all experience levels, not just beginners, because we knew that the design solution would need to work well for users of varying experience levels. Figure 5 shows the final Start Menu, with the Programs sub-menu open. The final Start Menu integrated functions other than starting programs, to give users a single-button home base in the UI."
I think it's because people read top-to-bottom. If they had located the task bar on the top of the screen, they could have had programs listed on top and it would work for reading order and mouse movement.
Well by that logic, why's the Start menu at the bottom? (Rhetorical question: I assume it's because then it would have been TOO much like the Apple menu).
> One thing I'd like to see explained is the location of "Programs" at the top of the Start menu, rather than right at the bottom where it would be closer and less mouse movement.
If you move the taskbar to the left or top, this problem is dealt with. (As is the problem that later versions of windows -- before they got rid of it altogether -- moved "Programs" below the dynamically-added links to things that Windows thinks you are more likely to use, which keeps those more-likely things farther from the start button if you keep the taskbar at the bottom.)
I wonder if the taskbar was originally planned for one of those two (top/left) locations, but got moved to the bottom later.
Am I the only one who misses the Program Manager? I've never found a reimplementation of the idea in any OS I've used since 3.1.
Windows 95 actually still included the program manager and you could have used it as your shell, if you really wanted: http://toastytech.com/guis/win95progman.png
Well, that link inspired me to go through that website and start browsing the Sick Windows Tricks section again... I'd forgotten about some of those.
Links if anyone's interested:
http://toastytech.com/guis/misc.html
http://toastytech.com/guis/miscb.html
http://toastytech.com/guis/miscc.html
http://toastytech.com/guis/win1x2x.html
http://toastytech.com/guis/misce.html
Make a shortcut to the start menu folder so that it opens in the file explorer?
Now there's no Programs button at all. Just a list of apps.