Comment by tkahn6
16 years ago
The justification must come from the free market, if free market is to be the moral system.
How can there exist a free market without the guarantee of the protection of private property? Without that you have anarchy (whoever is physically strongest wins).
I've never heard of someone invoking the idea of a "free market" without implying that the agents of the market are protected from physical harm.
This is by no means 'official' but from the first sentence of the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market:
"A free market is a market without economic intervention and regulation by government except to outlaw and prosecute force or fraud."
When people say "free market" this is what they imply.
What, in a free market moral system, prevents slavery?
The government.
How can there exist a free market without the guarantee of the protection of private property? Without that you have anarchy
See "anarcho-capitalism": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism
In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other security services would be provided by voluntarily-funded competitors such as private defense agencies rather than through taxation, and money would be privately and competitively provided in an open market.
You continue...
> > What, in a free market moral system, prevents slavery?
> The government.
No. Slavery is prevented because the income generated by those would-be slaves is less than the income generated when those people fill the role of "consumer".
Also, if there are non-consensual exchanges, then by definition it is not a free market, but that simply avoids the question...
How do you figure that prevents slavery? It doesn't prevent slavery right now... buying a russian sex slave and making her work 12 hour days in a club seems to generate a lot more income than she would as a "consumer".
I could turn the question around and ask you how the government prevents this, as the foundation of your question assumes that it's not doing so.
3 replies →