Comment by shrikant
16 years ago
I'm not surprised that someone whose ideology makes him believe that Einstein's contribution to society was smaller than that of the bosses of Lehman or AIG would be disappointed by reality.
Would you care to clarify? I genuinely don't see where you are getting this from.
He's saying that since Einstein wasn't a rich man, by the author's logic, he couldn't have contributed much to society.
No, he doesn't say so. The reverse of A -> B is not B -> A or even (not A) -> (not B), but (not B) -> (not A).
The "runny tally" part says something very different than A -> B. It says A <-> B.
contributes -> rich : (not rich) -> (not contributes)... what exactly are you arguing?
2 replies →