Comment by SubiculumCode
9 years ago
The thing to do is to check for what is potentially inconsistent with your hypothesis. For example, what about the neural link company?
9 years ago
The thing to do is to check for what is potentially inconsistent with your hypothesis. For example, what about the neural link company?
That is totally how you are going to fly his rockets :-) So much easier if you just put on a helmet and now you can use your thoughts to control the switches and inputs.
As a pilot I find this idea disconcerting because my thoughts are so imprecise compared to my actions. However, I suppose it would be like learning to ride a bike; you'd get used to what it feels like for your brain to guide the rocket much like a bicycle rider shifts their weight. But really, couldn't a computer do this better?
See this article: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/420756/wheelchair-makes-t...
Consider a man/machine interface where the man controls the intent and the machine controls the precision.
I'd hate to see what letting my mind drift does to a flying ship.
Why bring a bottle of earth with us everywhere we go? Why not adapt ourselves to the environments rather than the environments to us?