Comment by icedchai 8 years ago Was there a problem installing Putty? 7 comments icedchai Reply asendra 8 years ago Yes. Putty. icedchai 8 years ago Strange. I never had a problem with it 10 years ago. Perhaps our expectations for a terminal have changed in that time. samfisher83 8 years ago Putty works fine. You can even do x11 forwarding or socks proxing. If you have an x11 server running on your machine you can have a linux display. PascLeRasc 8 years ago Putty's been being distributed over unsecured HTTP for years - I wouldn't be surprised if some companies' IT departments forbid it. ac29 8 years ago The main page [0] and main download [1] are HTTPS. GPG signatures are provided as well.[0] https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/latest.ht...[1] https://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/w64/putty-64bit-... lostmsu 8 years ago That probably changed just recently. icedchai 8 years ago Downloading something over HTTPS doesn't magically make it secure.
asendra 8 years ago Yes. Putty. icedchai 8 years ago Strange. I never had a problem with it 10 years ago. Perhaps our expectations for a terminal have changed in that time. samfisher83 8 years ago Putty works fine. You can even do x11 forwarding or socks proxing. If you have an x11 server running on your machine you can have a linux display.
icedchai 8 years ago Strange. I never had a problem with it 10 years ago. Perhaps our expectations for a terminal have changed in that time. samfisher83 8 years ago Putty works fine. You can even do x11 forwarding or socks proxing. If you have an x11 server running on your machine you can have a linux display.
samfisher83 8 years ago Putty works fine. You can even do x11 forwarding or socks proxing. If you have an x11 server running on your machine you can have a linux display.
PascLeRasc 8 years ago Putty's been being distributed over unsecured HTTP for years - I wouldn't be surprised if some companies' IT departments forbid it. ac29 8 years ago The main page [0] and main download [1] are HTTPS. GPG signatures are provided as well.[0] https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/latest.ht...[1] https://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/w64/putty-64bit-... lostmsu 8 years ago That probably changed just recently. icedchai 8 years ago Downloading something over HTTPS doesn't magically make it secure.
ac29 8 years ago The main page [0] and main download [1] are HTTPS. GPG signatures are provided as well.[0] https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/latest.ht...[1] https://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/w64/putty-64bit-... lostmsu 8 years ago That probably changed just recently.
Yes. Putty.
Strange. I never had a problem with it 10 years ago. Perhaps our expectations for a terminal have changed in that time.
Putty works fine. You can even do x11 forwarding or socks proxing. If you have an x11 server running on your machine you can have a linux display.
Putty's been being distributed over unsecured HTTP for years - I wouldn't be surprised if some companies' IT departments forbid it.
The main page [0] and main download [1] are HTTPS. GPG signatures are provided as well.
[0] https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/latest.ht...
[1] https://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/w64/putty-64bit-...
That probably changed just recently.
Downloading something over HTTPS doesn't magically make it secure.