Comment by tradersam

8 years ago

I don't agree — that's why things like redundancy are commonplace. :D

“You're weak on logic, that's the trouble with you. You're like the guy in the story who was caught in a sudden shower and Who ran to a grove of trees and got under one. He wasn't worried, you see, because he figured when one tree got wet through, he would just get under another one."

http://multivax.com/last_question.html

  • Huh, I don't think I've seen a reference to that story in years, but just emailed it to a coworker a couple hours ago.

    • One of my all time favorites. Though it took me a while to remember the source of the quote. I thought it had been used in the context of global warming so google didn’t turn up much. Then I remembered it’s actually from a story about universal cooling.

That's not a hard drive. That's a system built on top of hard drives.

And so is perkeep.

  • That's incorrect. RAID is a system build on top of hard drives for redundancy. Redundancy (for this use of the word) is simply duplication across multiple hard-drives, which doesn't require a system at all.

    • Really, this is a very simplistic view of long term storage.

      A RAID is not magically more reliable than a single drive, it needs a bunch of infrastructure and it needs to be duplicated to some other location far away enough to ensure that a single catastrophe such as a fire does not destroy your entire raid.

      You are missing the wood for the trees: hard drives and raid devices are storage mechanisms that fall far short of the boundary conditions set to keep something permanently, at worst you will store your data for a couple of hour like that and in ideal conditions maybe for a couple of years, but on a scale of decades or centuries they are useless as a complete solution, though they could be part of such a solution.

      5 replies →

    • Just saying to yourself "I save all my stuff on two drives" is a system. It's just kind of a crappy one that's really prone to failure.