The media? No, they hate them because they took all their ad revenue.
Republicans? No, they hate them for the censorship controversy that happened a year or so ago, and because it is full of ultra left wing silicon Valley types.
Democrats? No, they hate them for the whole Cambridge analytica, Russian data thing.
Facebook has made a lot of enemies, and there really isn't any sort of constituency that SUPPORTS them.
Bunch of companies get a lot of their customers through Facebok. Those will probably support (finanically and otherwise) FB as long as there are no obviously better ways to get customers. Not for any sentimental reason, just because their business relies on it.
It is more effective to organise for a cause than against a politician. Presidents are intentionally difficult to remove. The bar for promoting action against Facebook is lower than for prompting action against the President.
Trump has many supporters(not me). I don't think any facebook users particularly like facebook, it's just where "everyone" is.
Exactly this.
Who even supports FB?
The media? No, they hate them because they took all their ad revenue.
Republicans? No, they hate them for the censorship controversy that happened a year or so ago, and because it is full of ultra left wing silicon Valley types.
Democrats? No, they hate them for the whole Cambridge analytica, Russian data thing.
Facebook has made a lot of enemies, and there really isn't any sort of constituency that SUPPORTS them.
Bunch of companies get a lot of their customers through Facebok. Those will probably support (finanically and otherwise) FB as long as there are no obviously better ways to get customers. Not for any sentimental reason, just because their business relies on it.
1 reply →
They have two major things.
1. Money
2. The fact that they are the only source of information that a good percentage of the world uses.
Money can be used to buy power, and they already have a not-insignificant level of control over the flow of information (which is power itself).
Facebook's ability to prop itself up and exist as it does, despite all the animus against it, reminds me of the essay Meditations on Moloch.
Still, absent an adequate replacement people will continue to stay there.
1 reply →
> better than against Trump?
It is more effective to organise for a cause than against a politician. Presidents are intentionally difficult to remove. The bar for promoting action against Facebook is lower than for prompting action against the President.