Comment by thinkcomp 15 years ago The main link on this thread is incorrect. The IMs are from 2004, not 2006. 1 comment thinkcomp Reply brianpan 15 years ago Agreed, the New Yorker mentioned 2006 as the date when the IMs were discovered and the boingboing article screwed it up.http://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims...
brianpan 15 years ago Agreed, the New Yorker mentioned 2006 as the date when the IMs were discovered and the boingboing article screwed it up.http://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims...
Agreed, the New Yorker mentioned 2006 as the date when the IMs were discovered and the boingboing article screwed it up.
http://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims...