Comment by SolarNet 8 years ago The hashmap the author wrote is .95, it's the google ones with a 0.5 load factor. 2 comments SolarNet Reply utopcell 8 years ago Is this true? From the article: ''ska::flat_hash_map has a max_load_factor of 0.5''. ska::flat_hash_map is the author's implementation (but maybe not the most recent iteration ?) jpetso 8 years ago Right, ska::bytell_hash_map is the most recent iteration and ska::flat_hash_map was the previous one.
utopcell 8 years ago Is this true? From the article: ''ska::flat_hash_map has a max_load_factor of 0.5''. ska::flat_hash_map is the author's implementation (but maybe not the most recent iteration ?) jpetso 8 years ago Right, ska::bytell_hash_map is the most recent iteration and ska::flat_hash_map was the previous one.
jpetso 8 years ago Right, ska::bytell_hash_map is the most recent iteration and ska::flat_hash_map was the previous one.
Is this true? From the article: ''ska::flat_hash_map has a max_load_factor of 0.5''. ska::flat_hash_map is the author's implementation (but maybe not the most recent iteration ?)
Right, ska::bytell_hash_map is the most recent iteration and ska::flat_hash_map was the previous one.