Comment by SlowRobotAhead
7 years ago
Oh I agree, the table on your site says that. It's extremely wrong. Would have been much less obvious if they had selected the more important SCOTUS case just 2 years earlier.
By pushing the agenda you implied with "2A against the states" you showed your cards to not care about the facts.
The table is correct. 100% correct. It's maintained by a law school, and is verified by a professor of Constitutional Law at least annually.
As a lawyer, I trust the Cornell Legal Information Institute. I have used it in my practice.
You know how the CDC was banned from advocating gun control in 1996 because of the junk studies the Clinton admin pushed for in 1992 as justification for their upcoming gun control legislation? It came out of Harvard and Princeton. Almost all discredited, full data never released, one of the main "researches" still employed at Harvard.
Bloomberg just gave Johns Hopkins and Yale money to "study" gun control (with outcomes predetermined). And a few years ago gave Harvard $350 MILLION to push the same agenda.
You can take that garbage they push and eat it up, they're paying good money for exactly that.
I wonder what the Joyce Foundation gives to Cornell every year?
The LII is literally just an accessible form of the various federal codes, statutes, regulations, and certain administrative rulings. It can be verified against paper copies or against paid services like Westlaw and Nexis.
The LII has been around for more than a decade. The LII is used by progressives, conservatives, libertarians, socialists, the current (Trump) administration and the former (Obama) administration, all with no complaints. It has been used by lawyers and judges on every side of the aisle. If there was any bias, it would have come out by now.
What point are you trying to make? That Cornell law school is trying to be political here?
1 reply →
I don't have an agenda here, nor did I learn about these facts from the link above. You are simply spreading misinformation.