Comment by devwastaken
7 years ago
Typically that kind of evidence doesn't just make itself available due to the nature of the crime. If employees themselves are orchestrating protests, they probably have information we don't. You can't just start dropping names and slandering.
A big mistake to believe those protestors are acting rationally. I'm not saying they are not, but assuming that they are is a mistake.
Those two lines of logic don't go together. If in your opinion it's a big mistake to believe they're rational, you are saying they're not being rational. There's no neutrality there.
You can assume that there is unknown information being acted upon. Unless there's proof otherwise that the protest is lying you infact can and should assume it's authenticity. Or at the least not be involved without clear knowledge.
>Unless there's proof otherwise that the protest is lying you infact can and should assume it's authenticity.
Thank God that's not the way justice system works.
1 reply →
> you infact can and should assume it's authenticity.
Why should you?
1 reply →