Comment by mehrdadn

7 years ago

Any idea why they haven't responded to people's requests for FUSE? It's the second-most requested feature and should enable applications like this.

3 comments

mehrdadn

Reply
zmj  7 years ago

They have: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/projfs/proj...

  • mehrdadn  7 years ago

    That looks awesome (thanks for sharing) but it seems to be a different thing? People are looking for a way to run existing Linux FUSE in SL, not develop new virtual file system implementations. They haven't responded to that request at all. https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/266908-command-prompt-con...

    • int_19h  7 years ago

      Windows expects different things from an FS, so it makes sense for a native userspace FS API to be different from FUSE.

      But once you have it, it shouldn't be difficult to write a FUSE adapter on top, mapping across those differences as best as possible.