Comment by phaedryx

6 years ago

Hmm, I wonder if "genderless" will be more distracting than a clearly male or female voice. It seems unnatural.

3 comments

phaedryx

Reply
daenz  6 years ago

I'm half serious when I say this, but calling it "unnatural" can border on intolerance, for somewhat obvious reasons.

  • zamalek  6 years ago

    If we could figure out how to make a genderless voice, then it would be intolerant. This is not a gender neutral voice. It sounds like it's cycling between female-type and male-type voices with a very strong bias towards female-type.

    I applaud the effort, but it falls very short. The voice itself is intolerant because it's almost a parody.