Comment by BurningFrog 6 years ago To me, unit tests replaces almost all I got from type safety. And that's just a side effect even! 3 comments BurningFrog Reply NieDzejkob 6 years ago Tests can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence. BurningFrog 6 years ago That's also true of type safety, and every other technique... NieDzejkob 6 years ago Not if you take into account the bug classes the technique intends to eliminate.
NieDzejkob 6 years ago Tests can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence. BurningFrog 6 years ago That's also true of type safety, and every other technique... NieDzejkob 6 years ago Not if you take into account the bug classes the technique intends to eliminate.
BurningFrog 6 years ago That's also true of type safety, and every other technique... NieDzejkob 6 years ago Not if you take into account the bug classes the technique intends to eliminate.
NieDzejkob 6 years ago Not if you take into account the bug classes the technique intends to eliminate.
Tests can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence.
That's also true of type safety, and every other technique...
Not if you take into account the bug classes the technique intends to eliminate.