Comment by Ygg2 6 years ago Probably should add Java to that list. The sooner Oracle stops existing, the better. 10 comments Ygg2 Reply MaxBarraclough 6 years ago OpenJDK is on pretty solid legal ground, no? fierarul 6 years ago Haha, OpenJDK is wholly owned by Oracle. There is no separate legal entity. License wise it's GPL w/ CPE. MaxBarraclough 6 years ago Plus the OpenJDK Community TCK Licensing Agreement.No-one's seriously concerned that adopting OpenJDK could land them in legal trouble, as far as I know. I don't think a separate legal entity is always necessary. 2 replies → benibela 6 years ago No Java in the kernel! fierarul 6 years ago The BPF has bytecode and a JIT. The JVM has a very good JIT. Let's add Java to the kernel and see! akerro 6 years ago Google and Microsoft too! anon73044 6 years ago Microsoft and Google contribute more to open source than any other company.Source: https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/microsoft-ma... https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/17/google-remains-the-top-ope...
MaxBarraclough 6 years ago OpenJDK is on pretty solid legal ground, no? fierarul 6 years ago Haha, OpenJDK is wholly owned by Oracle. There is no separate legal entity. License wise it's GPL w/ CPE. MaxBarraclough 6 years ago Plus the OpenJDK Community TCK Licensing Agreement.No-one's seriously concerned that adopting OpenJDK could land them in legal trouble, as far as I know. I don't think a separate legal entity is always necessary. 2 replies →
fierarul 6 years ago Haha, OpenJDK is wholly owned by Oracle. There is no separate legal entity. License wise it's GPL w/ CPE. MaxBarraclough 6 years ago Plus the OpenJDK Community TCK Licensing Agreement.No-one's seriously concerned that adopting OpenJDK could land them in legal trouble, as far as I know. I don't think a separate legal entity is always necessary. 2 replies →
MaxBarraclough 6 years ago Plus the OpenJDK Community TCK Licensing Agreement.No-one's seriously concerned that adopting OpenJDK could land them in legal trouble, as far as I know. I don't think a separate legal entity is always necessary. 2 replies →
benibela 6 years ago No Java in the kernel! fierarul 6 years ago The BPF has bytecode and a JIT. The JVM has a very good JIT. Let's add Java to the kernel and see!
fierarul 6 years ago The BPF has bytecode and a JIT. The JVM has a very good JIT. Let's add Java to the kernel and see!
akerro 6 years ago Google and Microsoft too! anon73044 6 years ago Microsoft and Google contribute more to open source than any other company.Source: https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/microsoft-ma... https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/17/google-remains-the-top-ope...
anon73044 6 years ago Microsoft and Google contribute more to open source than any other company.Source: https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/microsoft-ma... https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/17/google-remains-the-top-ope...
OpenJDK is on pretty solid legal ground, no?
Haha, OpenJDK is wholly owned by Oracle. There is no separate legal entity. License wise it's GPL w/ CPE.
Plus the OpenJDK Community TCK Licensing Agreement.
No-one's seriously concerned that adopting OpenJDK could land them in legal trouble, as far as I know. I don't think a separate legal entity is always necessary.
2 replies →
No Java in the kernel!
The BPF has bytecode and a JIT. The JVM has a very good JIT. Let's add Java to the kernel and see!
Google and Microsoft too!
Microsoft and Google contribute more to open source than any other company.
Source: https://www.techrepublic.com/google-amp/article/microsoft-ma... https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/17/google-remains-the-top-ope...