Comment by NikolaeVarius 6 years ago Title is incorrect, this has been available for quite a while 5 comments NikolaeVarius Reply dang 6 years ago We've fixed the title. Submitters: please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. This is in the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.(Submitted title was "Entire Apollo 11 Guidance Computer Source Code is now in the public domain") osamagirl69 6 years ago I would argue that It should have (2016) appended to it to match the HN style, but it is otherwise accurate. rahuldottech 6 years ago My bad, didn't realize that it's been out for a while. ForHackernews 6 years ago Also, if you want to get really really technical, it's _always_ been in the public domain because it's a work by the US federal government and thus ineligible for copyright: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_t... elliotec 6 years ago But it's still available "now" so I don't think it's that inaccurate.
dang 6 years ago We've fixed the title. Submitters: please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. This is in the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.(Submitted title was "Entire Apollo 11 Guidance Computer Source Code is now in the public domain")
osamagirl69 6 years ago I would argue that It should have (2016) appended to it to match the HN style, but it is otherwise accurate. rahuldottech 6 years ago My bad, didn't realize that it's been out for a while.
ForHackernews 6 years ago Also, if you want to get really really technical, it's _always_ been in the public domain because it's a work by the US federal government and thus ineligible for copyright: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_t...
We've fixed the title. Submitters: please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. This is in the site guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
(Submitted title was "Entire Apollo 11 Guidance Computer Source Code is now in the public domain")
I would argue that It should have (2016) appended to it to match the HN style, but it is otherwise accurate.
My bad, didn't realize that it's been out for a while.
Also, if you want to get really really technical, it's _always_ been in the public domain because it's a work by the US federal government and thus ineligible for copyright: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_works_by_t...
But it's still available "now" so I don't think it's that inaccurate.