Comment by gkoberger 6 years ago I didn't mean to imply that; I meant to explicitly say that. 4 comments gkoberger Reply kelnos 6 years ago ... which appears to be explicitly incorrect. toomuchtodo 6 years ago Close enough to zero that for our purposes, we can safely round down to it. chucksmash 6 years ago If M is the set of all imessage users and S is "has received a blue dot spam message", then:gkoberger said:∃m∈M ¬S(m)then mmlgr said pardon me, but:∃m∈M S(m)and then you were like:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∃m∈M ¬S(m)but I've got to tell you:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∀m∈M ¬S(m)∃m∈M ¬S(m)≡¬∀m∈M S(m)∃m∈M S(m)≢∀m∈M S(m) efreak 6 years ago I would have been able to read this in school. Now I only know what it means from context.
kelnos 6 years ago ... which appears to be explicitly incorrect. toomuchtodo 6 years ago Close enough to zero that for our purposes, we can safely round down to it. chucksmash 6 years ago If M is the set of all imessage users and S is "has received a blue dot spam message", then:gkoberger said:∃m∈M ¬S(m)then mmlgr said pardon me, but:∃m∈M S(m)and then you were like:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∃m∈M ¬S(m)but I've got to tell you:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∀m∈M ¬S(m)∃m∈M ¬S(m)≡¬∀m∈M S(m)∃m∈M S(m)≢∀m∈M S(m) efreak 6 years ago I would have been able to read this in school. Now I only know what it means from context.
chucksmash 6 years ago If M is the set of all imessage users and S is "has received a blue dot spam message", then:gkoberger said:∃m∈M ¬S(m)then mmlgr said pardon me, but:∃m∈M S(m)and then you were like:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∃m∈M ¬S(m)but I've got to tell you:∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∀m∈M ¬S(m)∃m∈M ¬S(m)≡¬∀m∈M S(m)∃m∈M S(m)≢∀m∈M S(m) efreak 6 years ago I would have been able to read this in school. Now I only know what it means from context.
efreak 6 years ago I would have been able to read this in school. Now I only know what it means from context.
... which appears to be explicitly incorrect.
Close enough to zero that for our purposes, we can safely round down to it.
If M is the set of all imessage users and S is "has received a blue dot spam message", then:
gkoberger said:
∃m∈M ¬S(m)
then mmlgr said pardon me, but:
∃m∈M S(m)
and then you were like:
∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∃m∈M ¬S(m)
but I've got to tell you:
∃m∈M S(m)≡¬∀m∈M ¬S(m)
∃m∈M ¬S(m)≡¬∀m∈M S(m)
∃m∈M S(m)≢∀m∈M S(m)
I would have been able to read this in school. Now I only know what it means from context.