It was the barest of understandings. When I realised there is a class of people who make decisions on what journalists write, I realised how misaligned the 'tech zeitgeist' can be
I'd like to know how you would explain a complicated topic to the average reader, all keeping it between 600-700 words, on a tight deadline, with quotes from a variety of people, and engaging enough to hold a reader's attention to know how this particular topic will impact their lives.
These are the hurdles reporters face when reporting on complicated topics.
It was the barest of understandings. When I realised there is a class of people who make decisions on what journalists write, I realised how misaligned the 'tech zeitgeist' can be
I'd like to know how you would explain a complicated topic to the average reader, all keeping it between 600-700 words, on a tight deadline, with quotes from a variety of people, and engaging enough to hold a reader's attention to know how this particular topic will impact their lives.
These are the hurdles reporters face when reporting on complicated topics.
Why do it in that format at all?
2 replies →
Well if I was an expert in it, I would probably be able to. It's the mark of understanding something well that you can explain it easily.
I'm struggling to understand your point beyond "she didn't do literally the worst possible job she could have done".