Comment by rumcajz 5 years ago That sounds exploitable. People would strategically vote "I don't understand" to delay the initiative. 3 comments rumcajz Reply m_mueller 5 years ago Why do that instead of just "no"? rumcajz 5 years ago Because likely to elicit reworking of the proposal you would need less than 50% of the vote. To defeat the proposal you need at least 50%. m_mueller 5 years ago you could still deal with that. one option would be to just go for the outcome with the highest percentage, instead of the simple 50% majority.
m_mueller 5 years ago Why do that instead of just "no"? rumcajz 5 years ago Because likely to elicit reworking of the proposal you would need less than 50% of the vote. To defeat the proposal you need at least 50%. m_mueller 5 years ago you could still deal with that. one option would be to just go for the outcome with the highest percentage, instead of the simple 50% majority.
rumcajz 5 years ago Because likely to elicit reworking of the proposal you would need less than 50% of the vote. To defeat the proposal you need at least 50%. m_mueller 5 years ago you could still deal with that. one option would be to just go for the outcome with the highest percentage, instead of the simple 50% majority.
m_mueller 5 years ago you could still deal with that. one option would be to just go for the outcome with the highest percentage, instead of the simple 50% majority.
Why do that instead of just "no"?
Because likely to elicit reworking of the proposal you would need less than 50% of the vote. To defeat the proposal you need at least 50%.
you could still deal with that. one option would be to just go for the outcome with the highest percentage, instead of the simple 50% majority.