You would think a site named "Image Sensor World" would know what CIS stands for and not write "...hoping to win 60% of the global Market Share of CIS Image Sensors by...".
I don't know why you're being downvoted, when was the last time you saw someone spell out central processing unit? Random access memory? Hard disk drive?
Given the context, its not always required to reiterate acronyms.
There are 269 definitions for CIS on Acronym Finder. The first one is "Computer Information Systems" there is also "Contact Image Sensor" before we get to "CMOS Image Sensor".
Even among specialists acronyms may cause confusion.
Yes, I wouldn't think you'd need to expand "CMOS Image Sensor" on a site named "Image Sensor World".
You would think a site named "Image Sensor World" would know what CIS stands for and not write "...hoping to win 60% of the global Market Share of CIS Image Sensors by...".
MDN wrote "HTTP Protocol".
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Overview
I don't know why you're being downvoted, when was the last time you saw someone spell out central processing unit? Random access memory? Hard disk drive?
Given the context, its not always required to reiterate acronyms.
There are 269 definitions for CIS on Acronym Finder. The first one is "Computer Information Systems" there is also "Contact Image Sensor" before we get to "CMOS Image Sensor".
Even among specialists acronyms may cause confusion.
The domain name is "image-sensors-world.blogspot.com". I assume the intended audience is people who are into image sensors.
There’s 325 acronyms for PC, 126 for RAM, etc but you don’t expect a tech enthusiast site to spell out those for you? At least I hope not.
It is how ever best practice in most writing style guides
Pretty much. The whole blog is dedicated to imaging news and sensors.
It's extremely poor communication and writing and worth a down vote.