Comment by ablekh
6 years ago
This issue is not about conveyance, but rather about readability. As simple as that. So, let's agree to disagree. :-)
6 years ago
This issue is not about conveyance, but rather about readability. As simple as that. So, let's agree to disagree. :-)
I'm of the opinion that there is much overlap between them. If I can have that (the opinion that is, not the concession on your part), then I accept.
I think that you and I are talking about different "readabilities". Yours implies a capability to effectively convey conceptual meaning, whereas mine (in this context) implies UX-focused - that is, purely visual - readability of the text at hand. I hope that this clarifies the source of our presumably different opinions.
I had considered both, as I think they considerably overlap (e: in this case, at least). In fact, if you want to want to completely isolate the two, I had mainly considered the UX-focused and visual aspect.
Contending over the ultimate conveyance of meaning in and of itself would have had me arguing for what we both already agree on.
Come onnnnn. It's not that bad with the grammar/punctuation, capitalization of acronyms and proper nouns, backtick highlights, and codeblocks.
2 replies →