Comment by ChrisMarshallNY 4 years ago The latter.And what is this "irony" of which you speak? 3 comments ChrisMarshallNY Reply Jestar342 4 years ago The irony of attempting to avoid bias, by using "has photo" bias. ChrisMarshallNY 4 years ago NM. It was a joke.Yeah, it is whacky, but most HR departments are run by lawyers, these days, and lawyers have a strange set of rules. Jestar342 4 years ago Damn, I figured it could have been. :)
Jestar342 4 years ago The irony of attempting to avoid bias, by using "has photo" bias. ChrisMarshallNY 4 years ago NM. It was a joke.Yeah, it is whacky, but most HR departments are run by lawyers, these days, and lawyers have a strange set of rules. Jestar342 4 years ago Damn, I figured it could have been. :)
ChrisMarshallNY 4 years ago NM. It was a joke.Yeah, it is whacky, but most HR departments are run by lawyers, these days, and lawyers have a strange set of rules. Jestar342 4 years ago Damn, I figured it could have been. :)
The irony of attempting to avoid bias, by using "has photo" bias.
NM. It was a joke.
Yeah, it is whacky, but most HR departments are run by lawyers, these days, and lawyers have a strange set of rules.
Damn, I figured it could have been. :)